2013/12/7 Florian Apolloner <[email protected]> > Hi, > > there is no need to convince us that this feature would be nice to have; > the ticket is accepted… >
Yes this ticket is accepted, but this is accepted from 3 years ago... I think that everybody knows that the current solution needs to improve in the self-referenced case. But Unai and me want to convince you of this solution is right. > I left a comment on the ticket page; and I think we should do this in one > patch instead of two, > There are two patches because the cache template loader is "very special", Unai asked in the irc channel if we could do two commits for this reason and they said that yes. But for me this is a minor question, although I would like don't have to change it. > so we can get the API right (Especially since I am not sure if skipping > the loaders is the correct approach). > This subject is very hard to understand, but when you understand it you will be able to see that this solution is a great and the best solution. This solution only skip a template when the template extends itself. This subject is very hard to explain and understand, but the solution is very very simple. If you want I could send you an example project with a typical use case. Best regards, -- Pablo Martín -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CALNyWLFR4P5b5FyCcw5-19i%2BS-Fo6WyGfmShsjuy3z8MhUC0eg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
