#20922 <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20922> introduced the option 
to choose a custom session data serializer. The default option is to use 
the new JSONSerializer starting from 1.6, since using pickle would lead to 
a remote code execution vulnerability when session data is stored in 
cookies.

While this can be considered a sensible security choice, it becomes 
inconvenient as the JSON encoder used by JSONSerializer is not the same 
used elsewhere in Django, as it only support basic data types: string, 
int/floats, booleans, nested dicts and lists, None.

The inconvenience is breaking compatibility with all third party apps that 
rely on storing extended data types (such as those supported by 
DjangoJSONEncoder) with the default settings. Properly serializing datetime 
(possibly tz-aware) can be hard, and changing the default puts the burden 
on third party apps coders.

They would have the option to either add two complexity layers (properly 
serializing/deserializing datetime objects, and not breaking compatibility 
with the previous versions of the same app), or to break compatibility with 
Django default settings.

As an example of commonly used data types that can't be stored anymore with 
default settings:

   - datetime, timedelta objects (supported by DjangoJSONEncoder)
   - decimal objects (supported by DjangoJSONEncoder)
   - arbitrary binary strings
   - Geometry objects

I think the option of reverting the default to pickle should be also 
considered.

[[I originally posted this as 
#21124<https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21124>, 
where it was closed as not a bug. What follows is the response I got, for 
reference:

by timo (core developer)

Thanks for your thoughts. I think most of the points you've raised were 
discussed during the implementation of this, either on the ticket 
(#20922<https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20922>) 
or on the linked pull request <https://github.com/django/django/pull/1488> (or 
the documentation 
itself<https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/http/sessions/#session-serialization>).
 
Could you please take a look at the discussion there if you haven't? If 
after reading that you still have disagreements, please raise the issue on 
django-developers rather than this ticket tracker. Thanks!

Suggestions for documentations edits or additions would also be welcome.

p.s. To address one of your points, one of the decisions was indeed to put 
the burden on third party app coders to serialize session data as simple 
data types like strings which would be compatible with JSON. We made this 
change to contrib.messages for example.
]]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to