W dniu środa, 26 czerwca 2013 17:26:12 UTC+2 użytkownik Carl Meyer napisał:
> > Do you have any new information to justify why the existing resolution > of #2239 should be reconsidered? > > I think the existing resolution is correct. This seems like a perfect > case for a third-party field class. I don't think the need to represent > MAC addresses in the database is common enough in web development to > warrant inclusion in Django core. > Hi! I agree it can be solved by third-party code - this is the way I do it right now. Unfortunately there is one thing which can't be done this way - database introspection. Maybe I'm wrong and it is possible to extend introspection code? Patryk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
