Can we PLEASE not have this argument? It's literally as old as email itself, and totally futile.
Drop it. Now. Jacob On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Wim Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4 Jun 2013, at 12:00 PM, Daniele Procida wrote: >> * quote what needs to be quoted for context >> * don't quote anything that doesn't need to be quoted > > This is, I think, the most useful/important point. There's no need to include > a whole string of previous messages in later ones; this isn't 1985, we all > have access to the rest of the thread if we want to go look. Trim the quotes > to what's immediately relevant or don't even include them. > >> * replies to particular points go immediately below quoted material > > This is certainly my preference, but as Michael Manfre says, I think it's not > something we need to be particularly uniform or strict about. I'd much rather > people put their effort into writing clearly than worrying about local > quoting customs. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
