Oh wow! I didn't expect to enter such difficult terrain ... ;-)
>From PEP-249 I understand that pyformat is encouraged and supported. I also read throug the discussion on the sig-db mailing list. As far as I understand you (Veron and many others) are trying to settle on what will be in the specs of v3.0 of the python db interface. And as far as I can see the opinions vary from qmark only to everything that has ever been used. The current situation appears to be like that: The different suppliers of db interfaces provide either all paramstyles or a subset of them. qmark and named are provided by all of them (maybe not). I would like to suggest, that we not try to sort this out in on the django side. Rather pass through the current situation and leave it up to the user what he/she want's to do. Still it might be good to point this out in the docs and suggest something that at the moment looks most future prove. Regards Roman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
