On 13 avr. 2013, at 22:13, Jeremy Dunck <[email protected]> wrote:

> After reading that ticket, I'm not sure what Alex and I are
> disagreeing on.  I was suggesting using django.utils.simplejson
> internally until it's removed, so that at least people could be
> consistent with django itself.  That way, DjangoJSONEncoder would be a
> simplejson.JSONEncoder (if simplejson is installed) until we remove
> the shim.

I see — I hadn't understood that you were proposing this.

> Anyway, since we've already deprecated utils.simplejson, since we've
> already done the damage here, and since doing a release to fix this is
> probably not going to help that many people (they've either already
> fixed their backwards-incompat or aren't planning on going to 1.5 any
> time soon)... maybe I agree we should leave it alone.


Yes, maybe we could have handled this differently, but at this point the
cure would be worse than the disease :|

-- 
Aymeric.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to