Sure - sounds like a reasonable suggestion to me. Feel free to open a ticket and provide a patch!
Yours, Russ Magee %-) On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Gabriel Warshauer-Baker <[email protected]>wrote: > As Luke Plant pointed out a few years ago, you *can* just do: > > def serialize_one_object_to_json(**obj): > return serializers.serialize("json", [obj])[1:-1] > But, since you almost always want this exact behavior when serializing a > single object, it seems like this is a good candidate for functionality to > add to serializers.serialize itself. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/2T5reILz_q8J. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
