On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:26 AM, dffdgsdfgsdfhjhtre <[email protected]> wrote: > https://github.com/zacharyvoase/django-boss > http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/2009/12/09/django-boss/ > > What is the outlook of something like this replacing the current way > management commands are handled by django? I'm no the author of django-boss, > but I think this syntax is much better and more pythonic than the Java-esque > way they are defined now.
I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, as always, my question is about backwards compatibility. As much as I may like the proposed syntax, we can't leave all the existing command definitions out there high and dry. I haven't done any investigation of this, and Zach's blog doesn't seem to address the issue -- at least, not directly; there's a reference to just needing to import command, but it doesn't make any comment about supporting the old way. What's the overhead on supporting both the old syntax and the new syntax in parallel? Yours, Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
