On 2 May 2012 11:56, Buddy Lindsey, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:
> um, not sure what happened to part of my response, but to summarize a > missing paragraph I would like the design to consider showing more of the > community as well. > > > Buddy Lindsey, Jr. wrote: > > > Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > > > * One of my personal goals for this redesign is to give more > visibility to community resources. Over the last 6 years, we've had a > number of unofficial projects come and done great service for the > community -- django people, several packaging indices, and so on. > However, many of these projects have died on the vine. I suspect one > of the reasons that these projects has died is that they've never > really been considered first class members of the community, and so > it's mentally easy to abandon them rather than seeking to hand them > off to a new maintainer. The only place I can see in Giovanni's > design for this sort of community content would be to bury it in the > footer, or on a separate part of the community page. > > > > > I came to Django from the Rails community and while I prefer Django > over Rails one thing I was disappointed with on arrival was I didn't > know "where" the Django community was, still not sure I do. Maybe the > django community is quiter than the Rails community is, but if I > didn't actively scour the internet I would think the community is dead > which is one of my evaluations of using a technology. > > my 2 cents on the community aspect. > > I agree. One part could be to integrate the google group(s) into the site using google web elements e.g http://www.google.com/webelements/#!/groups Regards, Atul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
