On 16 February 2012 15:42, Łukasz Rekucki <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) I can't argue about popularity, because I have no data, but most > Django applications I use come from github, so it's also quite > popular. > > 2) I don't think Django should care if the collaboration tool runs > python/django or java/grails as long as it's useful for developers. > Anything beyond that is politics and that's what DSF might care about > (I don't). > > 3) As for similar features... sometimes "similar" is not enough. I'm > not a regular Bitbucket user, so I maybe just didn't discover that, > but how can you add per line comments in patches on Bitbucket ? > Without that, code reviews for non-trivial patches is a real PITA.
Speaking from my own subjective tastes, I much prefer the experience of using Github over Bitbucket. Simple things like showing the source tree on a project's homepage make far more sense to me than showing the latest commit messages. If I'm looking for how something works in Django, the first thing I do is go to the github repo and browse the source code. Additionally, almost every library I use as a dependency can be found on Github, and familiarity is a very useful tool. South is the only significant exception to this. Regards, Andy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
