On 01/29/2012 07:51 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
On 30/01/2012, at 6:05 AM, Etienne Robillard wrote:
On 01/29/2012 04:27 PM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
You're not discriminated - everyone is treated the same way here and
judged only by their actions. By disobeying the rules of this list,
you're disrespecting it's members. If you disagree with the rules of
this community, you don't have to be part of it. Insulting it's core
members surely doesn't help you convince us, that it's a good choice
to accept your definition of "things which feels on topic with this
list".
OK good. I see your points but please observe I'm still searching where I'm
"disobeying" the rules ?
Let me help.
Firstly:
"...unless for fascists tracking/monitoring reasons of your visitors.."
You just called the OP a fascist, based purely on an architectural decision.
Secondly:
"Probably a really mediocre reference assuming its on stackoverflow.com already...
:-)"
You just called the entire population of Stack Overflow mediocre, and implied
that Ivan specifically was mediocre because he recommended it.
Thirdly:
"Don't expect anything from me but harsh responses when you're expecting only
mediocre answers"
We don't expect harsh responses *at all*. If you can't say something
constructive, say nothing at all.
None of these three comments were necessary, or were consistent with the tone
that we expect of participants in Django-developers. If you don't like what
someone is doing with technology, refrain from commenting. If you don't like
Stack Overflow, don't recommend it; if someone recommends something from Stack
Overflow that you disagree with, point out the specific flaws in the specific
suggestion that has been made. If you think someone is asking bad questions,
ignore them; or if you're feeling particularly helpful, assist them by
providing constructive guidance on asking better questions.
Regarding your reference to discussions about SOPA -- you'll notice that when
SOPA came up recently, it was very rapidly pointed out that such discussions
were off-topic for Django-developers, unless there was a specific call to
action for the Django codebase.
This isn't censorship, or the jackboot of the thought police. It's the Django
core team ensuring that we maintain a civil community.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
i still think stackoverflow.com is retarded. Ie it attracts stupid
peoples with stupid questions towards stupid solutions. :-)
As for your opinions, I respect them as always and that should be all
the same for me, ie without stupid moderation/trolling.
Otherwise this is only fascist moderation and I'm making only very
polite comments when talking about SOPA. So please be cool and observe
that the net is still a free place to discuss without stupid trolls to
dictate content.
Cheers,
E
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
