On Dec 5, 3:15 pm, Carl Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds orders of magnitude slower than running the tests under > Postgres here - and I haven't done any of the pg-config tweaking others > have mentioned (not even turning fsync off). Which leads me to think > that either there is some particularly unusual Postgres slowness on your > machine, or there's a major performance regression with the 3.x port and > Postgres (which, if it's that significant, would block merging the port).
Or maybe I was just frustrated at the slowness of the tests - they finished in under 3 hours. Given that the sqlite tests don't feel slow, I assumed the problem was in the postgresql configuration. So I have removed postgresql 9.1 (in case that was a factor), installed 8.4, and will re-run the tests. As you suggested, it's a good idea to run the tests on the trunk to confirm whether it's a postgres configuration issue. Another thing that's different, of course, is the psycopg2 driver for 3.x - I'm not sure if it would be expected to contribute to the problem. I can of course run under 2.x, with the standard psycopg2 driver installed. Anyway, I don't think we should worry too much about the performance just yet, especially as Anssi is not apparently seeing the same kind of slowdown. Others can confirm or refute whether this slowdown is seen in their environments. Regards, Vinay Sajip -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
