On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:17 PM Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: > > On 12/5/2019 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > ... > > Not sure if this is the right venue. Feel free to redirect me. > > > > Working my way through the survey, I'm finding that - for me at least - > > it would be trivial to de-anonymise my response. It isn't going to > > affect my answers but I wonder if it will affect the responses of others. > > > > I'm not sure what could be done about this. We need the demographic data > > but that combined with out relatively small population and relatively > > detailed data available about each committer's activities makes > > de-anonymisation easier. > > > > I think this is something to file under "things to take into > > consideration for the next survey" but I wanted to raise it while it was > > fresh in my mind. > > I have the same concern. One thing that can be done even now is to > establish a minimum size of group for which statistics will be broken > out for publication.
I expect that the number of people who selected the "10+ years on the board" won't meet that clip level. :-) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org
