I'm for a third option: banish Fedora. In all seriousness, (and people are going to think it's trolling, it isn't) I recommend ditching Linux (the kernel-- by all means, save GNU) and using a kernel that gives Freedom 3 in practice.
That's what Hyperbola is about. It wasn't Theo De Raadt that got me onto BSD, it was Hyperbola. Freedom 3 in practice means that... Well, okay, technically it doesn't actually require the project be forkable. Per se. But being forkable is a better test of freedom 3. It's a bad sign if no one can fork Linux. I want linux-libre to count-- I don't think it does. As for the firmware, thats's what Hyperbola is for. This isn't anti-Pentagon per se. OpenBSD got DOD funding aplenty. I honestly don't know if OpenBSD has gotten on board with any of this recent crap-- Distinguishing law from bandwagons of course. I'm not dissing any projects for simply following the laws. With that said the discussion on Debian years ago with regards to... It's not quite as simple as following laws or not following. But I'm only making fun of projects that take it farther than is legally required. Are there any doing that? Also Public vs. Private repos, Public ones are exempt. Whatever. I'm not apathetic about Ukraine or about Freedom 0, I'm apathetic about Fedora in a particular context of this. It's a fair question probably. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
