On 02/05/2019 12:17, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote: > Hi, > > Considering the CoC, I'm refraining myself from talking too much about a > certain individual. > > As there seems to be some confusion as to how Daniel Pocock was able to > access > the subscriber emails of this list: > > The list is visible to all subscribers here: > https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/roster/discussion > > Having list membership visible to all subscribers is common practice, and > virtually all public mailing list are configured to show this information on > request. After all, the mailing list archive is also available, and by > scraping the mailing list archive one would be able to gather a similar list… > > However, I'm pretty sure that using this information in the way that Mr. > Pocock did is very much not allowed under EU law. Maybe it's time to let the > legal team handle this transgression and evaluate FSFE's legal options? > > Cheers, > Johannes
Just to clarify as a subscriber to this list (lists.fsfe.org) I have no objection to the subscriber list or the archive. I would like to add that I agree the legal team need to handle this. Having the fellowship.eu e-mail mixed in with what I see as the official list at lists.fsfe.org, It is very confusing. As mentioned before some of the e-mails i am getting seem to have cc, to, from, reply to, I have never seen this in _any other_ e-mail list. Paul _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
