That's the requirement, that's why I started this topic. I've demonstrated that port 13 works perfectly fine with no-flood as long as the mac-table of openvswitch is populated with its MAC, I still don't understand why we can't adding a static entry here, seems silly. But I've pretty much accomplished that with the dl_dst flow however not all the way.... The goal is static mac-table and static arp. I have it working to the point where I see ICMP echo request make it to the VM behind port 13 just not back.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:51:33AM -0700, Tom Gajewski wrote: >> Yes of course I've opened up the switch again after flushing ;] >> Basically I have: >> >> cookie=0x0, duration=61132.153s, table=0, n_packets=112313104, >> n_bytes=18199375313, idle_age=0, priority=0 actions=NORMAL >> cookie=0x0, duration=61107.945s, table=0, n_packets=7122, >> n_bytes=467057, idle_age=1576, dl_dst=so:me:ma:cc actions=output:13 >> >> That's all, port 13 is set to no-flood of course. The above breaks >> return traffic out of port 13 -- even if there is an entry for >> so:me:ma:cc in the mac-table -- but the flow is working since I see >> ICMP requests coming in to the VM behind port 13 so this isn't an arp >> issue -- VM inside port 13 even knows the MAC of the ICMP requester, I >> checked. > > Why is port 13 no-flood? Then broadcast and multicast packets won't go > to it. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
