Hi Daniel,
Do you have any news related to this bug?
TIA,
Lluis
El 05/07/16 a les 03:07, Daniel Ye ha escrit:
Hi Lluis,
Basically, I use ovs-docker to associate to one port on the bridge to
a container. Steps are listed below:
1. Install docker on Ubuntu(May be other Linux version):
https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/ubuntulinux/.
2. Start two containers(use docker run), and the containers are named
container1 and container2.
3. Install ovs-docker and run “ovs-docker add-port br1 eth1 container1
--ipaddress=192.168.2.1/24”
and “ovs-docker add-port br2 eth1 container2
--ipaddress=192.168.2.2/24”.
4. Add tunnel port and physical nic on br1 and br2.
4. Enable IPFIX on the two bridge.
I think this will format the same topology as the one you give. You
can have a try. I will check the scenario you
give later.
Bests,
Daniel
On Jul 4, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Lluís Gifre <lgi...@ac.upc.edu
<mailto:lgi...@ac.upc.edu>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your comments!
I can try to use containers in my scenario.
Could you send me details on how to set-up your scenario (or a
similar one) using containers?
Best,
Lluis
On 03/07/16 03:06, Daniel Ye wrote:
Hi Lluis,
As I don’t have a test environment now, I tried with the topology as
below and
the openvswitch is installed from the latest code on Github:
container1 vxlan12 container2 vxlan21
| | | |
—— + — — — + — — —— + — — — + —
| br1 | | br2
|
——————— + —— ——————— +—
| |
eth0 eth1
In this scenario, I didn’t get any outage when I enabled the Bridge
IPFIX. I will try your test environment later.
Bests,
Daniel
On Jul 2, 2016, at 12:15 AM, Lluís Gifre <lgi...@ac.upc.edu> wrote:
ovs-vsctl clear bridge br1 ipfix
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss