Glad to hear you figured it out, Curious about: 1. Do you need to do flow remove in the loop after the "for in_port..." loop in you test?
2. Where in the outer loop do you add the sleep.? Thanks, Alex Wang, On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Tony van der Peet < tony.vanderp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alex > > Turns out that the only behaviour change is a slight timing change. If I > put a 0.2s sleep into the outer loop of the test I can make is pass > reliably. In other words, the flows are still being deleted correctly, it's > just that the test is so quick in changing the flows and expecting to be > able to test the new flow that it's seeing a failure. > > In the real world, there would of course be much less chance of this sort > of coordination between data and flow changes, so I am satisfied that > OpenVSwitch continues to operate in the same high quality way that I have > always experienced. > > Just have to update my tests a bit (sigh). > > Tony >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
