A few questions: Can I use the linux bonding driver and bind the dpdk port to bond0? If not (which I suspect), can I do LACP bonding in OVS when using DPDK?
If I apply the dpdk vhost patches as described below should I build OVS with IVSHMEM? — Gil On 1/30/15, 6:57 PM, "Traynor, Kevin" <kevin.tray...@intel.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of >>MCGRATH, GIL >> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 3:53 PM >> To: Justin Pettit; Ben Pfaff >> Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org >> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Tunneling and vhost support for dpdk >> >> Checking again on whether support for VhostNet is integrated in OVS DPDK >> yet - if so I assume I can just use the version from trunk in github. > >It's not upstreamed into OVS yet. The model now will be slightly >different as a >vhost library now exists in DPDK 1.8. If you want to try it out have a >look at >this post >http://www.openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-January/050278.html > >> >> >> >> On 11/22/14, 6:55 PM, "Justin Pettit" <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> On Nov 22, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 03:00:48PM +0000, MCGRATH, GIL wrote: >> >>> Has tunneling support and vhost support for dpdk been integrated >>yet? >> >>> I assume the tunneling includes vxlan? >> >> >> >> Yes, see README-native-tunneling.md. >> > >> >Just to be clear, though, I don't believe vhost support is integrated >> >yet. We spoke with Intel at the OVS Conference this week, and they're >>in >> >the process of re-spinning the patches based on feedback they received. >> > >> >--Justin >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list >> discuss@openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
