On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:20:48AM -0800, Ashok Chippa wrote:
> I added a flow to table0, but the flow is not shown correctly... Is this a
> bug?
> 
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0# ovs-ofctl del-flows br-int
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int
> NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0#
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0#
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0#
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0# ovs-ofctl add-flow br-int
> table=0,priority=9999,nw_src=1.1.1.1,nw_dst=1.1.1.2,actions=DROP
> 2015-02-03T09:14:06Z|00001|ofp_util|INFO|normalization changed ofp_match,
> details:
> 2015-02-03T09:14:06Z|00002|ofp_util|INFO| pre: nw_src=1.1.1.1,nw_dst=1.1.1.2
> 2015-02-03T09:14:06Z|00003|ofp_util|INFO|post:
> root@ashok-vb:/home/achippa/openvswitch-2.3.0# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int
> NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
>  cookie=0x0, duration=8.642s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=8,
> priority=9999 actions=drop
> 
> I ping 1.1.1.2 from 1.1.1.1 and the traffic passes through...!! What am I
> missing?

Please read the FAQ.

### Q: I ran "ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop"
   but I got a funny message like this:

       ofp_util|INFO|normalization changed ofp_match, details:
       ofp_util|INFO| pre: nw_dst=192.168.0.1
       ofp_util|INFO|post:

   and when I ran "ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0" I saw that my nw_dst
   match had disappeared, so that the flow ends up matching every
   packet.

A: The term "normalization" in the log message means that a flow
   cannot match on an L3 field without saying what L3 protocol is in
   use.  The "ovs-ofctl" command above didn't specify an L3 protocol,
   so the L3 field match was dropped.

   In this case, the L3 protocol could be IP or ARP.  A correct
   command for each possibility is, respectively:

       ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 ip,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop

   and 

       ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 arp,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop

   Similarly, a flow cannot match on an L4 field without saying what
   L4 protocol is in use.  For example, the flow match "tp_src=1234"
   is, by itself, meaningless and will be ignored.  Instead, to match
   TCP source port 1234, write "tcp,tp_src=1234", or to match UDP
   source port 1234, write "udp,tp_src=1234".
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to