Still waiting :) I cannot find the context (around the change) I saw in ofproto.c.rej in 2.3.0 ofproto.c. That's the reason for asking you for the patch (based on 2.3.0). I do not need the entire patch, just the small hunk that failed (in ofproto.c.rej I sent earlier). The faster I get it, the faster I can test it :)
Thanks On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Ashok Chippa <a.n.chi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can one of you please apply these diffs to 2.3.0 and provide me with a > patch. I am not able to readily figure out where (and how) in ofproto.c > this needs to be applied: It will take me more time to figure this out, as > I am not the original author of this code... > > Appreciate your help. I will then patch it and test it. Thanks. > > Here's ofproto.c.rej: > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Ashok Chippa <a.n.chi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, I figure so... Will do and let you know if it worked... >> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:13:42PM -0800, Ashok Chippa wrote: >>> > root@ashok-vb:/usr/local/bin# ovs-ofctl del-flows br-int >>> > root@ashok-vb:/usr/local/bin# ovs-ofctl dump-tables br-int >>> > OFPST_TABLE reply (xid=0x2): 254 tables >>> > 0: classifier: wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=10 >>> > lookup=0, matched=0 >>> > 1: table1 : wild=0x3fffff, max=1000000, active=0 >>> >>> If you apply the patch, then it will show active=0. >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
