On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I observed that the latest OVS with dpdk-1.8.0 and igb_uio starts to
>> drop packets earlier than a regular Linux ixgbe 10G interface, setup
>> follows:
>>
>> receiver/forwarder:
>> - 8 core/2 head system with E5-2603v2, cores 1-3 are given to OVS exclusively
>> - n-dpdk-rxqs=6, rx scattering is not enabled
>> - x520 da
>> - 3.10/3.18 host kernel
>> - during 'legacy mode' testing, queue interrupts are scattered through all
>> cores
>>
>> sender:
>> - 16-core E52630, netmap framework for packet generation
>> - pkt-gen -f tx -i eth2 -s 10.6.9.0-10.6.9.255 -d
>> 10.6.10.0-10.6.10.255 -S 90:e2:ba:84:19:a0 -D 90:e2:ba:85:06:07 -R
>> 11000000, results in 11Mpps 60-byte packet flood, there are constant
>> values during test.
>>
>> OVS contains only single drop rule at the moment:
>> ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=1,actions=DROP
>>
>> Packet generator was launched for tens of seconds for both Linux stack
>> and OVS+DPDK cases, resulting in zero drop/error count on the
>> interface in first, along with same counter values on pktgen and host
>> interface stat (means that the none of generated packets are
>> unaccounted).
>>
>> I selected rate for about 11M because OVS starts to do packet drop
>> around this value, after same short test interface stat shows
>> following:
>>
>> statistics : {collisions=0, rx_bytes=22003928768,
>> rx_crc_err=0, rx_dropped=0, rx_errors=10694693, rx_frame_err=0,
>> rx_over_err=0, rx_packets=343811387, tx_bytes=0, tx_dropped=0,
>> tx_errors=0, tx_packets=0}
>>
>> pktgen side:
>> Sent 354506080 packets, 60 bytes each, in 32.23 seconds.
>> Speed: 11.00 Mpps Bandwidth: 5.28 Gbps (raw 7.39 Gbps)
>>
>> If rate will be increased up to 13-14Mpps, the relative error/overall
>> ratio will rise up to a one third. So far OVS on dpdk shows perfect
>> results and I do not want to reject this solution due to exhaustive
>> behavior like described one, so I`m open for any suggestions to
>> improve the situation (except using 1.7 branch :) ).
>
> At a glance it looks like there is a problem with pmd threads, as they
> starting to consume about five thousandth of sys% on a dedicated cores
> during flood but in theory they should not. Any ideas for
> debugging/improving this situation are very welcomed!
Over the time from a last message I tried a couple of different
configurations, but packet loss starting to happen as early as at
7-8Mpps. Looks like that the bulk processing which has been in
OVS-DPDK distro is missing from series of patches
(http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-December/049722.html,
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-December/049723.html).
Before implementing this, I would like to know if there can be any
obvious (not for me unfortunately) clues on this performance issue.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
