On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:49:55PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:37:01PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > > I'm curious how you ended up laying this out. The OpenFlow spec says > > that the extra space should be used as an vendor ID in the form of an > > OUI. How did you reconcile this? > > You can probably get away with a lot if you make the most significant > byte of the extra 32 bits nonzero, because OpenFlow only specifies the > format of the other 24 bits if that byte is zero and leaves the rest of > the space reserved for future standardization. > > But that's kind of a nasty thing to do. > > Have you considered allowing database configuration to specify what kind > of attributes are expected and how to parse them? The configuration > could be P4-based, for example.
By the way, did you realize that you've been frozen? https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/11/msg00003.html _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
