On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:12:28PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:05:01PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:55:01PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> >> >> ovs-ofctl dump-ports currently reporting values not large than u32 in >> >> >> the mentioned branch. lib/ofp-util.c has no regressions at a glance, >> >> >> probably truncation going in the different (not so obvious) way. >> >> > >> >> > Are you using a 64-bit kernel? There is some unavoidable truncation >> >> > with 32-bit kernels. >> >> >> >> Yes, of course. >> > >> > Thanks. I guess you must have previously seen 64-bit values with some >> > earlier version. Do you know what the most recent version was? >> >> For 0fe1d7f39de9836fea01c560a6fdbfd1405096ea it is clearly positive >> that it reports 64-bit counter values (branch-2.1). Had not tested >> against other revisions yet. Are you suggesting that the counter >> behavior with 32b limit is currently taken as a right one? > > I am trying to narrow down the range of commits that could have caused > the problem. "git bisect" would be the ideal way to do it, if you are > willing and able to try it.
Heh, okay. I`m signing over bisection, please give me some time :) _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
