Hello, Ben, We are using pretty much recent kernel version, 3.13.0 released on Sept, included in linux 14.04 release.
Thank you, Sangho On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > Thank you for the bug reports! (In the future I'd suggest one bug > report per email because it makes it easier to handle each one.) > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:05:03PM -0700, Saurav Das wrote: > > Possible bug: ovs-ofctl display of actions > > > > Here is a table-miss-entry which is supposed to match everything. There > are > > no instructions associated with this entry. > > > > cookie=0x0, duration=31.700s, table=5, n_packets=7, n_bytes=686, > priority=0 > > actions=drop > > > > According to the OF1.3 spec, when there are no goto-instructions, > pipeline > > processing stops, and the action-set should get executed. > > We do believe this is what is happening in the switch - however the > display > > "actions=drop" is misleading, and possibly a holdover from OF1.0 > behavior, > > when no actions meant drop. Perhaps "actions=execute-action-set" may > better > > reflect OF1.3 behavior when there are no instructions. > > I can see how that could be misunderstood, but I doubt that we're going > to change such a long-standing OVS behavior on that basis. Certainly > not to something as awkward and backward-incompatible as > "execute-action-set"! I think that it's possible to change it to just > "actions=" without any actions specified in a backward-compatible > manner, and if that's better than I'd consider it. > > > Possible bug: group stats don't update > > > > Here is a group definition: > > > > > group_id=536870916,type=indirect,bucket=weight:0,actions=dec_ttl,set_field:00:00:01:01:01:80->eth_src,output:4 > > > > Here are the stats: > > > > > group_id=536870916,duration=202.091s,ref_count=0,packet_count=0,byte_count=0,bucket0:packet_count=0,byte_count=0 > > > > None of the counts go up, yet I know traffic is being processed by this > > group, as there is no other place where I have specified that packets > > should go out of port 4. > > Unfortunately OVS 2.3 does not implement group stats. They are > available on master, though, and will be in OVS 2.4. > > > Possible bug: group doing MPLS stuff doesn't work > > > > > > Here is the flow that points to the group (as part of the actions written > > to an action-set): > > > > cookie=0x0, duration=31.703s, table=2, n_packets=7, n_bytes=686, > > priority=65520,ip,nw_dst=7.7.7.0/24 > > > actions=write_actions(push_mpls:0x8847,set_field:103->mpls_label,group:2684354566),goto_table:5 > > > > In table 5, the packets hit the table-miss-entry, which has no > > instructions, so the action-set gets executed. > > > > Here is the group definition: > > > > > group_id=2684354566,type=indirect,bucket=weight:0,actions=dec_mpls_ttl,set_field:00:00:01:01:01:80->eth_src,set_field:00:00:02:02:02:80->eth_dst,output:6 > > > > Here are the error messages we see in the logs: > > > > > > 2014-08-29T23:58:53.367Z|00001|dpif(handler358)|WARN|system@ovs-system: > > failed to put[create] (Invalid argument) > > > dp_hash(0/0),recirc_id(0),skb_priority(0),in_port(5),skb_mark(0/0),eth(src=00:00:00:00:02:01,dst=00:00:01:01:01:80),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src= > > > 10.0.2.1/255.255.255.255,dst=7.7.7.7/255.255.255.255,proto=1/0xff,tos=0/0xfc,ttl=64/0xff,frag=no/0xff > ),icmp(type=8,code=0), > > > actions:set(eth(src=00:00:01:01:01:80,dst=00:00:02:02:02:80)),push_mpls(label=103,tc=0,ttl=63,bos=1,eth_type=0x8847),7 > > > > 2014-08-29T23:58:53.367Z|00002|dpif(handler358)|WARN|system@ovs-system: > > execute > > > set(eth(src=00:00:01:01:01:80,dst=00:00:02:02:02:80)),push_mpls(label=103,tc=0,ttl=63,bos=1,eth_type=0x8847),7 > > failed (Invalid argument) on packet > > > icmp,metadata=0,in_port=0,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=00:00:00:00:02:01,dl_dst=00:00:01:01:01:80,nw_src=10.0.2.1,nw_dst=7.7.7.7,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=64,icmp_type=8,icmp_code=0 > > Hmm, that's a strange error. Are you by chance running an older kernel > module that doesn't support the MPLS actions? Userspace should detect > that and fall back to implementing MPLS itself, but it's possible that > that logic is failing. > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
