On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:23:58AM +0000, Eyal Nissim wrote:
> 1.  I understand now that I'm expected to implement either "ofproto provider" 
> (such as ofproto_dpif.c)  or a "dpif provider" (such as dpif-linux.c) , not 
> both

Right.

> 2. since my implementation is HW related, implementing "ofproto provider" is 
> a better approach,

Probably.

> 3. Considering that 1 && 2 are correct, how do I remove the "dpif provider" 
> module in the most elegant way?

I'm not sure why you want to remove it at all.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to