On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:23:58AM +0000, Eyal Nissim wrote: > 1. I understand now that I'm expected to implement either "ofproto provider" > (such as ofproto_dpif.c) or a "dpif provider" (such as dpif-linux.c) , not > both
Right. > 2. since my implementation is HW related, implementing "ofproto provider" is > a better approach, Probably. > 3. Considering that 1 && 2 are correct, how do I remove the "dpif provider" > module in the most elegant way? I'm not sure why you want to remove it at all. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
