On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:37:27PM +0200, Christian Stigen Larsen wrote: > Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>: > > It looks like branch-2.1 needs a commit that only made it onto master. > > The log message didn't make it clear that it was a bug fix. > > > > Please try applying commit cfc50ae514f805dcd9c14589f21158185424daf6 to > > your local copy of OVS 2.1. > > I cherry-picked it onto origin/branch-2.1 (ovs-vsctl shows "2.1.2"): > > mininet> h1 ping -c10 h9 > PING 10.0.0.9 (10.0.0.9) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=62.1 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=90.5 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=69.1 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=100 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=80.9 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=71.5 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=101 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=89.7 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=70.3 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.0.9: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=104 ms > > --- 10.0.0.9 ping statistics --- > 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 62.131/83.995/104.044/14.441 ms > > This is it! > > I've verified it with/and without the commit, plus a reboot, just to be sure. > > Thank you so much for all the help!
Great, I applied this to branch-2.1 and it will appear in the next point release. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
