Please don't drop the list. Yes, that's basically what I meant.
--Justin On 2/5/14, 2:07 PM, "tyler derden" <serb...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Thank you Justin for your prompt response, I appreciate that! >Please correct for me if I am wrong, so what you meant is: If the switch >has no entry in the cam table for the Mac Address of the received packet, >it will forward the packet to the controller, and the controller will >push the packet back( according to the script) to a specific port instead >of telling the switch to flood in normal cases. > >Thank you. > >> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:51:14 -0800 >> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Stopping ARP on OpenVSwitch >> From: jpet...@nicira.com >> To: serb...@hotmail.com; discuss@openvswitch.org >> >> Can't you just write a flow that matches broadcast ARP and sends them to >> the controller? The controller can push down flows to send them to a >> specific port at a higher priority. >> >> --Justin >> >> >> On 2/5/14, 9:55 AM, "tyler derden" <serb...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> >I hope someone can help me with my question below! >> >I want to stop ARP broadcast on OVS whenever it gets a new packet with >> >new destination IP/Mac, and instead of broadcast just to send it >>directly >> >to the NOX controller, were the NOX controller will take the decision >>to >> >what specific switch port number to send the packet to. >> > >> >Any ideas how i can structure that? >> > >> >Thanks in advance :) >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >discuss mailing list >> >discuss@openvswitch.org >> >http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
