On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:03:17PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> Is there are any reasons to not cherry-pick mentioned change from the
> master? It may scare users who uses datapath version from branch and the
> fix almost clearly is harmless.
Looking at that commit, it's the following datapath commit, so Jesse
or Pravin are the right ones to make the call on a backport.
commit 8e04c6e10c28e42c715eb9fef749554c123bddbc
Author: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
Date: Wed Oct 16 15:28:23 2013 -0700
datapath: fix vport-netdev unregister
The combination of two commits:
commit 8e4e1713e4
("openvswitch: Simplify datapath locking.")
commit 2537b4dd0a
("openvswitch:: link upper device for port devices")
introduced a bug where upper_dev wasn't unlinked upon
netdev_unregister notification
The following steps:
modprobe openvswitch
ovs-dpctl add-dp test
ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap
ovs-dpctl add-if test tap1
ip tuntap del dev tap1 mode tap
...
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
