On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:25:53AM +0200, Madko wrote: > In fact I'm not trying to build, I'm just trying to enhance the spec file. > The real question is would you like to let people the choice to build > openvswitch rpm with or without ssl support. If it doesn't make sense (I > don't know if it's even possible to build without ssl), the first patch is > fine. It's really a little detail, I don't want to waste your time on it.
I see. I would prefer the patch that requires SSL, then. The Debian packaging has always required SSL support and it has not caused problems there. In general, having fewer variations in packaged software (e.g. SSL versus non-SSL flavors) makes life easier for users and administrators. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
