2013/10/4 Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>: > I don't understand why you think it's a strange choice to use the string > value "unlimited", for an unlimited value, or an integer, when an > integer limit is wanted. On the contrary, to me it seems transparently > easy to understand.
Yes, name is very transparently to understand. I have a question only from encoding/decoding side of json. And in many software for unlimited used number -1 to say that it is not null.. -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
