On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:30:33PM -1000, Nicholas Bastin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Nicholas Bastin <nick.bas...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > One thing that I think should be pointed out is that it is NOT the purpose > > of OVS in-band rules to forward traffic *for other devices* - the rules > > exist *only* to ensure that OVS's own control connection functions properly. > > > > A re-reading of the DESIGN document closely seems to indicate that this > might not be the case in all situations (although I believe that it > *should* be the case, lest you start making decisions that should be > reserved for the controller). It's not entirely clear. I am still at > least mostly convinced that the current behaviour is better than the > behaviour your patch proposes, but it probably requires more research.
Andreas, if the patch still makes sense to you, please respond to Nick's feedback. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
