On 2 July 2013 06:45, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote: > The only supported methods are miimon, carrier, and LACPDUs (for LACP > bonds, obviously). >
Just curious. Do you guys consider it good practice for users like Piotr to implement new bonding methods within a controller application? Is this higher-level functionality considered interesting/in-scope/on-topic in the context of Open vSwitch, or do you prefer that kind of discussion be taken up in the context of a specific controller e.g. on the Floodlight mailing list? Curious because higher-level features like ARP/ICMP/BFD monitoring and failover functionality seem to me like a great application area for the OpenFlow model. That's something that's already a pain to deal with in a multi-vendor context e.g. between a Cisco and a Juniper and seems like it could be neatly handled by a controller injecting and catching health check packets in strategic places. Cheers, -Luke
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
