and with out controller and in standalone ovs-vswitchd is at ~80% for the same traffic.
using *ovs-vsctl -V* ovs-vsctl (Open vSwitch) 1.4.2 Compiled Nov 23 2012 12:41:37 *ovs-controller -V* ovs-controller (Open vSwitch) 1.4.0+build0 Compiled Feb 18 2013 13:13:22 OpenFlow versions 0x1:0x1 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:28 AM, kevin parker <kevin.parker...@gmail.com>wrote: > Mostly HTTP, > > For confirming bench marked Apache with ab, ovs-vswitchd reached 100% and > ovs-controller 14% > > ovs-dpctl show at the time of benchmark > > system@xenbr0: > lookups: hit:55391 missed:966296 lost:0 > flows: 0 > port 0: xenbr0 (internal) > port 3: vif2.1 > port 4: vif1.1 > > Do i need to make any changes in ovs-controller. > > Thanks, > Kevin. > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:11:44PM +0530, kevin parker wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > i have ovs-controller with default setting (ovs-controller -v >> > ptcp:6633). >> > >> > >> > on xenserver host with ovs >> > >> > *ovs-vsctl get-fail-mode xenbr0* >> > *secure* >> > >> > I set it to secure mode to test that host should not use vswitchd for >> flows >> > and forward it to controller for generating flow .* >> > * >> > >> > *ovs-vsctl get-controller xenbr0* >> > *tcp:10.10.10.183:6633* >> > * >> > * >> > * ovs-dpctl show >> > * >> > * >> > hit:8560336 missed:1060122 lost:0 >> > flows: 81 >> > * >> > >> > where xenbr0 is an isolated bridge with no connection to host >> interfaces. >> > No other bridge is connected to this controller. >> > When i ping vms on same host l can see ovs-vswitchd using 35% CPU. >> > >> > and ovs-controller almost 11% CPU and some times non responsive ssh >> session >> > on hosts. >> >> What kind of trafffic do you have in your network? >> > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
