Thanks for your reply, Can you please clarify this,does *lost* indicate packet drop?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote: > Your question is essentially identical (including the version numbers) to > Kevin Parker's from a few hours earlier, so I'll give the same answer: > > We've made a lot of improvements in flow set up rate since version 1.4, so > upgrading to a more current version (we're on 1.10 now) will likely help. > We're currently working on multithreading the OVS userspace and adding > support for wildcarded flows in the kernel, which should substantially > improve flow set up performance. > > --Justin > > > On May 27, 2013, at 6:52 AM, ananthan <ananthannair...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am having high traffic vms running on Xenserver 6.0.2 with some vms > using more than 11mbps which include public and private traffic. > > And because of this high traffic vms i am not able to run more than 2 > vms on single host as ovs-vswitchd struggles to process packet resulting in > heavy packet loss. > > > > OVS Version: > > > > ovs 1.4.2 > > > > system@xapi3: > > lookups: hit:19216169494 missed:18847093088 lost:7227365 > > flows: 2581 > > port 0: xapi3 (internal) > > port 1: eth1 > > port 2: eth0 > > port 4: xapi4 (internal) > > port 9: vif6.0 > > port 14: vif12.0 > > port 19: vif16.0 > > port 20: vif17.0 > > > > may be because of this high miss rate ovs-vswitchd is consuming 80% CPU. > > > > Can some one please clarify this: > > > > 1.Is it normal for OVS to use 80% CPU for high traffic,is there any way > to bring down cpu usage as i am not able to run multiple high traffic vms > on same host,which makes virtualization inefficient. > > 2.Why there are lot of missed flows and can this be minimized? (From my > understanding missed is because Data path couldn't find flow and need to > contact user daemon to generate one). > > 3.I have read threads regarding high cpu usage because of too many flows > but in case its under 3000 and still using high cpu,can any one please > clarify this. > > > > Regards, > > Ananth > > _______________________________________________ > > discuss mailing list > > discuss@openvswitch.org > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss