Thanks for your reply, Can you please clarify this,does *lost* indicate
packet drop?



On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote:

> Your question is essentially identical (including the version numbers) to
> Kevin Parker's from a few hours earlier, so I'll give the same answer:
>
> We've made a lot of improvements in flow set up rate since version 1.4, so
> upgrading to a more current version (we're on 1.10 now) will likely help.
>  We're currently working on multithreading the OVS userspace and adding
> support for wildcarded flows in the kernel, which should substantially
> improve flow set up performance.
>
> --Justin
>
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 6:52 AM, ananthan <ananthannair...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >    I am having high traffic vms running on Xenserver 6.0.2 with some vms
> using more than 11mbps which include public and private traffic.
> > And because of this high traffic vms i am not able to run more than 2
> vms on single host as ovs-vswitchd struggles to process packet resulting in
> heavy packet loss.
> >
> > OVS Version:
> >
> > ovs 1.4.2
> >
> > system@xapi3:
> >       lookups: hit:19216169494 missed:18847093088 lost:7227365
> >       flows: 2581
> >       port 0: xapi3 (internal)
> >       port 1: eth1
> >       port 2: eth0
> >       port 4: xapi4 (internal)
> >       port 9: vif6.0
> >       port 14: vif12.0
> >       port 19: vif16.0
> >       port 20: vif17.0
> >
> > may be because of this high miss rate ovs-vswitchd is consuming  80% CPU.
> >
> > Can some one please clarify this:
> >
> > 1.Is it normal for OVS to use 80% CPU for high traffic,is there any way
> to bring down cpu usage as i am not able to run multiple high traffic vms
> on same host,which makes virtualization inefficient.
> > 2.Why there are lot of missed flows and can this be minimized? (From my
> understanding missed is because Data path couldn't find flow and need to
> contact user daemon to generate one).
> > 3.I have read threads regarding high cpu usage because of too many flows
> but in case its under 3000 and still using high cpu,can any one please
> clarify this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ananth
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to