Hello,

I just rechecked everything.  Result is the same.  I have included all of the steps used for testing:

[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 x86_64]#  rpm -qplf openvswitch-kmod-1.9.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm 
/lib/modules/3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64/kernel/extra/openvswitch/brcompat.ko
/lib/modules/3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64/kernel/extra/openvswitch/openvswitch.ko 

[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 openvswitch-1.9.0]# lsmod | grep openvswitch
[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 openvswitch-1.9.0]# insmod /lib/modules/3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64/kernel/extra/openvswitch/openvswitch.ko

[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 openvswitch-1.9.0]# dmesg
*snip*
openvswitch: Open vSwitch switching datapath 1.9.0, built May 10 2013 14:02:24 


[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 x86_64]# /etc/init.d/openvswitch start


[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 x86_64]# ovs-vsctl show
57b8b736-96dd-4e20-820b-e45228611685
ovs_version: "1.9.0" 

Now create bridges and patchport:
ovs-vsctl add-br xenbr0-int
ovs-vsctl add-br xenbr0-tun
ovs-vsctl add-port xenbr0-int xenbr0-int-patch-tun
ovs-vsctl set interface xenbr0-int-patch-tun type=patch
ovs-vsctl set interface xenbr0-int-patch-tun options:peer=xenbr0-tun-patch-int
ovs-vsctl add-port xenbr0-tun xenbr0-tun-patch-int
ovs-vsctl set interface xenbr0-tun-patch-int type=patch
ovs-vsctl set interface xenbr0-tun-patch-int options:peer=xenbr0-int-patch-tun

[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 x86_64]# ovs-vsctl show
57b8b736-96dd-4e20-820b-e45228611685
Bridge "xenbr0-tun"
Port "xenbr0-tun"
Interface "xenbr0-tun"
type: internal
Port "xenbr0-tun-patch-int"
Interface "xenbr0-tun-patch-int"
type: patch
options: {peer="xenbr0-int-patch-tun"}
Bridge "xenbr0-int"
Port "xenbr0-int"
Interface "xenbr0-int"
type: internal
Port "xenbr0-int-patch-tun"
Interface "xenbr0-int-patch-tun"
type: patch
options: {peer="xenbr0-tun-patch-int"}
ovs_version: "1.9.0" 

[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 x86_64]#  ovs-vsctl get Interface xenbr0-tun-patch-int ofport
-1

[root@centos-ovs-build-06-00-00-6b-df-48 x86_64]# ovs-ofctl show xenbr0-tun
OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x1): dpid:00007a10e9763c46
n_tables:255, n_buffers:256
capabilities: FLOW_STATS TABLE_STATS PORT_STATS QUEUE_STATS ARP_MATCH_IP
actions: OUTPUT SET_VLAN_VID SET_VLAN_PCP STRIP_VLAN SET_DL_SRC SET_DL_DST SET_NW_SRC SET_NW_DST SET_NW_TOS SET_TP_SRC SET_TP_DST ENQUEUE
LOCAL(xenbr0-tun): addr:7a:10:e9:76:3c:46
config: PORT_DOWN
state: LINK_DOWN
speed: 100 Mbps now, 100 Mbps max
OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x3): frags=normal miss_send_len=0 

kmod package was built using the following:

rpmbuild -bb -D "kversion 3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64" openvswitch-kmod-fedora.spec  where openvswitch-kmod-fedora.spec is the spec file included in the tarball under /rhel/.


____________________________________________
 
Kris Lindgren
Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy.com, LLC.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Openvswitch 1.9 patch ports do not have port
numbers
From: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
Date: Fri, May 10, 2013 12:01 pm
To: Kris Lindgren <klindg...@godaddy.com>
Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org

Double-check everything. You probably do not have the right version
of the kernel
module loaded.

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Kris Lindgren <klindg...@godaddy.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, I forgot to mention that point. I have the kmod compiled and loaded:
>
> lsmod | grep openvswitch:
>
> openvswitch 92457 0
>
> uname -a; ls
> /lib/modules/3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64/kernel/extra/openvswitch/openvswitch.ko:
>
> Linux localhost 3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 15 17:07:18
> UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> /lib/modules/3.4.36-6.el6.centos.alt.x86_64/kernel/extra/openvswitch/openvswitch.ko
> ____________________________________________
>
> Kris Lindgren
> Linux Systems Engineer
> GoDaddy.com, LLC.
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Openvswitch 1.9 patch ports do not have port
> numbers
> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> Date: Fri, May 10, 2013 11:33 am
> To: Kris Lindgren <klindg...@godaddy.com>
> Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org
>
> You are probably encountering a problem explained in the FAQ:
>
> If you are using Open vSwitch 1.9 or an earlier version, then you
> need to be using the kernel module bundled with Open vSwitch rather
> than the one that is integrated into Linux 3.3 and later, because
> Open vSwitch 1.9 and earlier versions need kernel support for patch
> ports. This also means that in Open vSwitch 1.9 and earlier, patch
> ports will not work with the userspace datapath, only with the
> kernel module.
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Kris Lindgren <klindg...@godaddy.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am running into an issue with the tar.gz download of 1.9 from the main
>> site. I am attempting to mimic an openstack quantum setup for tunneling.
>> Under this setup openflow rules are applied to a patch port on the tunnel
>> bridge to translate vlans to tunnel id's and vice-versa. The problem is
>> that under 1.9 patch ports do not have a port number so it is not possible
>> to apply openflow rules to them. This use to work under 1.4 and is working
>> again under 1.10.
>>
>> ovs-vsctl show:
>> *snip*
>> Bridge "xenbr0-tun"
>> Port "xenbr0-tun-patch-int"
>> Interface "xenbr0-tun-patch-int"
>> type: patch
>> options: {peer="xenbr0-int-patch-tun"}
>> Port "xenbr0-tun"
>> Interface "xenbr0-tun"
>> type: internal
>> Port "gre1"
>> Interface "gre1"
>> type: gre
>> options: {in_key=flow, out_key=flow,
>> remote_ip="10.224.50.3"}
>> Bridge "xenbr0-int"
>> Port "xenbr0-int"
>> Interface "xenbr0-int"
>> type: internal
>> Port "veth-xenbr0-int"
>> Interface "veth-xenbr0-int"
>> Port "xenbr0-int-patch-tun"
>> Interface "xenbr0-int-patch-tun"
>> type: patch
>> options: {peer="xenbr0-tun-patch-int"}
>> ovs_version: "1.9.0"
>> *snip*
>>
>> ovs-ofctl show xenbr0-tun:
>>
>> OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x1): dpid:0000c64d2e707940
>>
>> n_tables:255, n_buffers:256
>> capabilities: FLOW_STATS TABLE_STATS PORT_STATS QUEUE_STATS ARP_MATCH_IP
>> actions: OUTPUT SET_VLAN_VID SET_VLAN_PCP STRIP_VLAN SET_DL_SRC SET_DL_DST
>> SET_NW_SRC SET_NW_DST SET_NW_TOS SET_TP_SRC SET_TP_DST ENQUEUE
>> 1(gre1): addr:56:52:09:c7:06:69
>> config: 0
>> state: 0
>> speed: 100 Mbps now, 100 Mbps max
>> LOCAL(xenbr0-tun): addr:c6:4d:2e:70:79:40
>> config: 0
>> state: 0
>> speed: 100 Mbps now, 100 Mbps max
>>
>> ovs-vsctl get Interface xenbr0-tun-patch-int ofport:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Now using the latest 1.10 source with the same setup commands I get the
>> following:
>>
>> ovs-vsctl show
>> *snip*
>>
>> Bridge "xenbr0-int"
>>
>> Port "xenbr0-int"
>> Interface "xenbr0-int"
>> type: internal
>> Port "xenbr0-int-patch-tun"
>> Interface "xenbr0-int-patch-tun"
>> type: patch
>> options: {peer="xenbr0-tun-patch-int"}
>> Port "veth-xenbr0-int"
>> Interface "veth-xenbr0-int"
>> Bridge "xenbr0-tun"
>> Port "xenbr0-tun"
>> Interface "xenbr0-tun"
>> type: internal
>> Port "gre1"
>> Interface "gre1"
>> type: gre
>> options: {in_key=flow, out_key=flow,
>> remote_ip="10.224.50.3"}
>> Port "xenbr0-tun-patch-int"
>> Interface "xenbr0-tun-patch-int"
>> type: patch
>> options: {peer="xenbr0-int-patch-tun"}
>> *snip*
>>
>> ovs-ofctl show xenbr0-tun:
>>
>> OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x2): dpid:000082520c63ae4d
>>
>> n_tables:254, n_buffers:256
>> capabilities: FLOW_STATS TABLE_STATS PORT_STATS QUEUE_STATS ARP_MATCH_IP
>> actions: OUTPUT SET_VLAN_VID SET_VLAN_PCP STRIP_VLAN SET_DL_SRC SET_DL_DST
>> SET_NW_SRC SET_NW_DST SET_NW_TOS SET_TP_SRC SET_TP_DST ENQUEUE
>> 1(xenbr0-tun-patc): addr:76:a2:4c:f7:55:6d
>> config: 0
>> state: 0
>> speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
>> 3(gre1): addr:92:83:1a:a8:05:2b
>> config: 0
>> state: 0
>> speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
>> LOCAL(xenbr0-tun): addr:82:52:0c:63:ae:4d
>> config: 0
>> state: 0
>> speed: 0 Mbps now, 0 Mbps max
>> OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x4): frags=normal miss_send_len=0
>>
>> ovs-vsctl get Interface xenbr0-tun-patch-int ofport:
>>
>> 1
>>
>> As you can see under 1.10 patch ports once again have port numbers and
>> show
>> up correctly as ports. Is their a newer version of 1.9.0 that I should be
>> using?
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> Kris Lindgren
>> Linux Systems Engineer
>> GoDaddy, LLC.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss@openvswitch.org
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding
> getting blamed when it all blows up." Andrew Morton



--
"I don't normally do acked-by's. I think it's my way of avoiding
getting blamed when it all blows up." Andrew Morton
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to