Your image is corrupted, please find another way to send it instead of
as HTML email.
From your description it sounds like there is no difference between
the configurations except for the bridge name, is that true? I
suspect that you have formed some sort of loop. Does your monitoring
cause any additional packets to be generated (i.e. are you trying to
do it over the network)?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:21 AM, 春祥 王 <wchunx...@yahoo.cn> wrote:
> I have two hosts
> HOST1:192.168.0.224
> with VM1:192.168.0.33(VLAN=1)
> HOST2:192.168.0.25
> with VM2:192.168.0.44(VLAN=1)
>
> on HOST1
> ovs-vsctl add-port br0 gre0 -- set interface gre0 type=gre
> options:remote_ip=192.168.0.25
>
> ovs-vsctl show
> 044f6b32-f6c0-4ce7-9d8b-41c9891d4aa7
> Bridge "br0"
> Port "gre0"
> Interface "gre0"
> type: gre
> options: {remote_ip="192.168.0.25"}
> Port "tap1"
> tag: 1
> Interface "tap1"
> Port "eth1"
> Interface "eth1"
> Port "br0"
> Interface "br0"
> type: internal
> ovs_version: "1.7.1"
>
> on HOST2
> ovs-vsctl add-port br0 gre0 -- set interface gre0 type=gre
> options:remote_ip=192.168.0.224
>
> I can ping from vm1 to vm2
>
> root@localhost:~# ping 192.168.0.44
>
> PING 192.168.0.44 (192.168.0.44) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.62 ms
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.74 ms
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=3.33 ms
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.10 ms
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.45 ms
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=3.97 ms
>
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=17.1 ms
>
> ^C
>
> --- 192.168.0.44 ping statistics ---
>
> 7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6009ms
>
> but when I used wireshark,I found too many packages on eth1,and HOST2
> crashed soon.
>
>
> Then I followed
> http://networkstatic.net/open-vswitch-gre-tunnel-configuration/
> add gre0 and tap1 to br1(a new bridge)instead of br0.
>
> on HOST1
> ovs-vsctl show
> 044f6b32-f6c0-4ce7-9d8b-41c9891d4aa7
> Bridge "br0"
> Port "br0"
> Interface "br0"
> type: internal
> Port "eth1"
> Interface "eth1"
> Bridge "br1"
> Port "br1"
> Interface "br1"
> type: internal
> Port "tap1"
> tag: 1
> Interface "tap1"
> Port "gre0"
> Interface "gre0"
> type: gre
> options: {remote_ip="192.168.0.25"}
> ovs_version: "1.7.1"
>
> I can ping from vm1 to vm2
> root@localhost:~# ping 192.168.0.44
>
> PING 192.168.0.44 (192.168.0.44) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.24 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.859 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.775 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.838 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.844 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.856 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.757 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.824 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.44: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.816 ms
> ^C
> --- 192.168.0.22 ping statistics ---
> 9 packets transmitted, 9 received, 0% packet loss, time 8012ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.757/0.868/1.249/0.142 ms
>
> And everything is ok.
>
> I want to know the reasons for the first case.Is there any mistakes?
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
