Hi Reid,
sure ,
The behavior is unexpected.
I tried a simpler topology and similar thing happens.
I tried the following topology .
controller
| |
s1-----s2
| |
h1 h2
I now added 1 bridge on s1--h1 link and 1 bridge on s2 --h2 link
The bridges are listening to the controller
The host where able to ping each other and I could see flow entry in the
bridges created.
Now when I add 2 bridges on s1-- s2 in both s1 and s2.
The host are not able to ping the each other.
Is it that the new bridges are not informing about there connections to the
controller or is there some fault in the controller.
I am not able to understand.!
Thanks and Regards,
Priyanka
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Reid Price <rpr...@nicira.com> wrote:
> Hi priyanka,
>
> It may be helpful if you replace "I am facing some weird behavior' with a
> more traditional:
>
> * Actions
> * Expected behavior
> * Observed behavior
>
> Also, do you see the same behavior in a simpler setup?
>
> -Reid
>
> On Nov 22, 2555 BE, at 20:59, priyanka singhal <
> 06priyanka.sing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am facing an issue in setting up the following topology with ovs and a
> controller.
> >
> > controller
> > | | |
> > s1 --- s2-- s3
> > | |
> > h1 h2
> > and s1 and s3 are also connected.
> >
> > I am running the controller(floodlight) on a separate machine and all
> the switches on different machines having ovs installed. i have added
> bridge interfaces(br-int) on all the switches on all the links.
> >
> > I am facing some weird behavior could any one pls letme know If
> something is wrong with my set up.!!
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > priyanka
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
