Yes, I'd expect that to work (assuming that "ab" means "application").
What does "ovs-appctl bond/show <bondname>" print? On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:39:59AM +0100, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: > I see. > Then shouldn't a simple ab with 2 or more sessions balance the traffic > across 2 uplinks, using source port hashing? > It looks like this is not the case when I'm testing on v1.3.0... > > Thanks > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > Looking at the documentation, it says, "such as destination MAC > > address, IP address, and TCP port." The phrase "such as" introduces a > > list of examples and is not meant to be exclusive. > > > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:52:08AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > Does it say destination IP/port only? At any rate, balance-tcp balances > > > on L2 through L4 packet headers, including source and destination ports. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: > > > > Ahh, yes - balance-tcp. > > > > I'ts balancing using destination ip/port - is it possible to do source > > > > ip/port balancing? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: > > > > > > Outbound traffic seems to depend on SLB bonding (where a source > > switch > > > > > port > > > > > > is needed for every session to utilize a link). > > > > > > Is it somehow possible to use policies like the linux kernel > > bonding > > > > > driver > > > > > > is offering? (layer2+3 / layer3+4) ? > > > > > > > > > > Yes. See ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5) for configuration details. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
