It's busted again due to the merge from next. I have a patch out to fix it again, though. (I haven't tested the accuracy, though.)
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:22:51PM -0700, kk yap wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the very fast response. TY tested the code and it worked. > > Regards > KK > > On 18 May 2011 12:55, Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> Looking at the code, ovs-openflowd returns facet + stat as packet > >> count for the flow removed. ?The number recorded by facet is correct, > >> but the sum of the value exceed the real value. ?This occurs at the > >> facet_update_stats function. ?What is the purpose of the addition? > >> Can we expect accurate statistics from OVS? > > > > I should have responded to this question in my previous email. ?Packet > > statistics are recorded in a best-effort fashion. ?In general they > > should be accurate, but there is no hard guarantee that they are > > especially in certain edge cases involving complex flow tables > > including resubmit actions. ?In short, you should expect accurate > > statistics from OVS noting the aforementioned caveat. > > > > Thanks again for reporting this bug. > > Ethan > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
