You are think I should add route for eth1 or br0 ??
I don't know.
May I should delete eth1 from br0, and add eth1 as uplink for switch br0.
But how do this?
Dnia 20-08-2010 o 13:05:11 ahmed amamou <ahmed.ama...@hotmail.com>
napisał(a):
deb64:~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
193.XX.212.0 * 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
193.XX.212.0 * 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
vi0
193.XX.212.0 * 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
vif1
193.XX.212.0 * 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
vif2
193.XX.212.0 * 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0
vif3
default 193.XX.215.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
I think the problem come from the routes definition
as eth0 is still up and it's the first entry to route to net 193.XX.212.0
machine that contain this routing table will always send packet to
193.XX.212.0 from eth0
and it's also the default route so all packet that aren't in
193.XX.212.0 network will be sent from eth0
if you put eth0 down it will normally work because you will remove the
first entry in routing table (that routing from eth0)
but if you ping a host that isn't in the 193.XX.212.0 network you 'll
have to add a default route
hope that will help you
--
Tomasz Waśniewski
Admin HRD.pl
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org
