On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote: > Ben recently updated them in the "next" branch, and we're using them > internally. The "next" branch is what all future "stable" releases will be > based on. It uses a configuration database instead of a configuration file, > so it's not really backwards-compatible from an end-user perspective. What > time frame are you working on? The "next" branch isn't stable enough for > production use yet, but basing a release on master may be confusing to users > in the future.
Will the database get rid of the need to kill -HUP the switch daemon? I'm working on a network wrapper interface for another project and I just wanted to get a basic sense for what I functionality it will need and how it will make use of the vswitches. Are there other changes related to basic usage that come along with this new configuration database management? Thanks, Todd -- Todd Deshane http://todddeshane.net http://runningxen.com _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org
