A.) There is nothing wrong with what they are doing
B.) If you (or others, or even a majority) are unhappy with what they are 
doing, the answer is not for you to impose your will on them in a manner that 
makes it even harder for them to see competition later, but to -- instead -- 
move towards competition most ricky tick, so that there will be other 
competitors who behave in a manner you will be happy with.

I don't see these two points as being as disparate as you seem to be implying 
they are.

D


On Jul 22, 2014, at 8:38 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote:

> That's a very different discussion than the idea that there is nothing wrong 
> with what they are doing.
> 
> David Lang
> 
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Derek Balling wrote:
> 
>> Easier, and better, than further entrenching ISPs by turning them into 
>> protected common carriers.
>> 
>>> On Jul 22, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Adam Compton <compt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 7/22/14, 5:18 PM, Derek Balling wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 22, 2014, at 7:16 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) 
>>>>> <lop...@nedharvey.com> wrote:
>>>>> I would agree, only if the consumers had more competition to choose from. 
>>>>>  There is a huge percentage of America whose choices are Comcast or 
>>>>> Verizon.
>>>> And so - again - at the risk of noticing the horse is dead - the 
>>>> competition issue is trivially solved by the gov't, and nobody would 
>>>> complain but lobbyists.
>>> 
>>> "[...] telecom firms have successfully pushed 20 states to pass laws 
>>> limiting the reach of community-owned utilities like EPB." [1]
>>> 
>>> I agree that ending government-granted monopolies and opening Verizon et 
>>> al. up to competition would be _a_ solution, but I don't think it would be 
>>> anywhere near as easy to accomplish as you're making it out to be.
>>> 
>>> - Adam Compton
>>> 
>>> [1]: 
>>> http://www.salon.com/2014/07/18/comcasts_worst_nightmare_how_tennessee_could_save_americas_internet_partner/
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss@lists.lopsa.org
>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>> http://lopsa.org/
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to