Kent Borg wrote:
> I'm getting a complaint from AT&T saying I don't have reverse DNS set up
> correctly.
>
> > host ff-ip4-mx-vip2.prodigy.net[144.160.159.22]
> > said: 550 5.7.1 Connections not accepted from servers without a valid
> > sender domain.flph839 Fix reverse DNS for 64.105.205.123 (in reply to MAIL
> > FROM command)
>
> Looks to me like I do. Anyone know what they are complaining about?
>
dig -t mx borg.org
...
borg.org. 600 IN MX 10 mail2.borg.org.
borg.org. 600 IN MX 0 mail.borg.org.
...
mail.borg.org. 3600 IN A 64.105.205.123
dig -t a mail2.borg.org
...
mail2.borg.org. 600 IN CNAME la.borg.org.
la.borg.org. 3600 IN A 66.134.52.5
dig -x 64.105.205.123
...
123.205.105.64.in-addr.arpa. 38400 IN PTR mail.borg.org.
dig -x 66.134.52.5
...
5.52.134.66.in-addr.arpa. 38400 IN PTR la.borg.org
these all look fine. Maybe you're sending something odd
in MAIL FROM?
-dsr-
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
