+1 for forums. Simos
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Horst <bho...@mac.com> wrote: > +1 > > Ben > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:17 AM, adept techlists - kazar <techli...@ade.pt> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > (reasons: > > > > 1. Clarity -- rather than confusing users with info about OOo that may > not apply to LO) > > 2. Risk management -- LO foundation control over the forums' management, > backups, servers, persistence/availability > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
