Carlo Strata wrote:
> >That bug is not even fully analysed, let alone fixed yet - so why
> >should we even start pondering to delay a release of an otherwise
> >improved version?
>
> You are right, but this one is the only one I read about in these
> days and that is a regression...
> I'm sure there are some other ones ("3.4's most annoying bugs")...
>
Hi Carlo,
sure - but either there's a safe fix, that the responsible devs have
been poked with & that got cherry-picked in time for -3-4 - or
there isn't. Probably all I want to say is that your mail comes
some 2-3 weeks late - please remind people to review fixes before
release tagging happens.
As many others have said before, the point of time-based releases is
to get fixes shipped to users, instead of being caught in that "just
one more fix" dead-lock.
Nothing prevents us from doing another release from the libo-3-4
branch next year, and surely over the time, this branch will
acculumate more useful fixes than just this one Calc bug.
> I say this because Rainer (Bielefeld) told me (on September the 1st,
> 2011) that TDF are fixing all bugs in Master trunk (3.5) and cherry
> pick something good for 3.4's releases... This means that 3.5 may be
> better than any 3.4 is now and will ever be.
>
Absolutely! That's the whole point in development, to make a better
version! :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
