On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You describe how all the committers and people on the steering > committee know these details. Well, of course. But what about all the > people at Apache who are trying to learn about the work you guys have > done here? Trying to learn the details of your Foundation, its > organization, and its (current) backing association? Trying to learn > who handles your donations, and how those proceeds are disbursed? > If you had come up with a plan of merging the foundations, all these details would have been worked through. I don't think it matters now given the fork. > > BRM, Jim, and I are trying to say that that information is opaque. It > takes direct involvement from Florian to achieve understanding. > You should have gotten your question answered before the proposal was submitted for a vote. > > Our goal is not to "beat" you. This is not a competition. That is not > how Apache operates. > Your goal is not to beat LO, but by choosing a fork you make cooperation difficult via license incompatibilities and social engineering. So if you aren't cooperating or competing then what word would you recommend? -Keith -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
