Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does > > still contain patches. (Removing those would be a big regression about > > what we ship right now)
Thanks. So some distributions will still need to patch LibreOffice because the "vanilla" LibreOffice would be a regression for their users with respect to the current OpenOffice.org/Go-OO/LibreOffice they ship. This, together with issues like the weird problem you linked to > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31271 indeed qualify as "compelling arguments" for distributions needing to patch LibreOffice much like they do with OpenOffice.org (even though of course in some cases the patches will be temporary fixes that will eventually get merged in the main codebase). > > Get some clue. And don't speak about this if you don't, kthxbye. ... > Sorry, I apologize No need. LibreOffice is meritocracy-driven, not politeness-driven. Thanks, Andrea. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
