Sorry to get into the discussion, but what are your goals, to be arrogant, or not? Or to make ODF the defacto standard which saddly is still NOT? The important thing is to fulfill the needs from potential users, specially in the enterprise. *e.g. *E-mail composers in the enterprise usually support text, RTF and HTML, and will automatically reply in the same format, why? Because enterprise users need to support all market standards! The same applies for File Formats, the enterprise users need to support the maket-share leaders, and even though we don't like it, the market leaders are still MS File Formats. It's not about being arrogant, or making a point, is about winning market-share, and if we don't understand that, we already lost the race.
Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 01:10, Robert Holtzman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:35:24AM +0000, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > > On 31/12/10 10:32, M. Fioretti wrote: > > > > > >wrong. Mine (mutt) doesn't for example, > > > > Then I would plonk you immediately. How do you not see that that is > > TOTALLY ARROGANT? > > If I send you an email in plain text and you reply in HTML, because > > YOU want to, that is complete rudeness and intolerance. > > Please excuse the double reply to this post. It was inadvertent. > > -- > Bob Holtzman > Key ID: 8D549279 > "If you think you're getting free lunch, > check the price of the beer" > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > [email protected]<discuss%[email protected]> > Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
