Now, will there be an official statement from the LibreOffice leaders
about a name change?

Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 08:44 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina:
> That is the intention in the end if im not mistaken. Correct me if im wrong.
> 
> On 12/13/2010 12:03 AM, Valter Mura wrote:
> > In data martedì 07 dicembre 2010 18:27:35, Mirek M. ha scritto:
> >
> >> 2010/12/7 Samuel Mehrbrodt<s.mehrbr...@googlemail.com>
> >>
> >>> Today there was an announcement that KOffice got a new name (Calligra)
> >>> and they also renamed some of the Applications. "KWord" became "Words",
> >>> "KSpread" became "Tables" and "KPresenter" was renamed to "Stages".
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering whether such a name change has been considered for the
> >>> LibreOffice Applications. The point is that I don't really like the
> >>> current names. I'm not a Name Designer, but Writer, Calc and Impress
> >>> don't really sound good in my ears and I would even say that most people
> >>> using OpenOffice would not know the names of the Applications they are
> >>> using, only that it's OpenOffice.
> >>>
> >>> If LibreOffice changed the names of the Applications shipping, that
> >>> might also help people to differentiate between OpenOffice and
> >>> LibreOffice in Future.
> >>>
> >>> Here a comparison of the names of text processing, spreadsheet and
> >>> presentation program of six Office Suites:
> >>>
> >>> MS Office: Word, Excel, PowerPoint
> >>> Apple iWork: Pages, Numbers, Keynote
> >>> Calligra(former KOffice): Words, Tables, Stages
> >>> Softmaker Office: Textmaker, Planmaker, Presentations
> >>> Corel WordPerfect Office: WordPerfect, Quattro Pro, Presentations
> >>> OpenOffice.org: Writer, Calc, Impress
> >>>
> >>> I think MS Office, iWork and now Calligra have the best names for their
> >>> applications. It's easy to spell and easy to remember.
> >>> I would like to hear what everyone else is thinking about changing names
> >>> for LibreOffice applications.
> > I like the idea, it could be an idea, above all to achieve more personality.
> > AFAIK, currently LIbreOffice could be considered simply a "clone" of OOo, 
> > only
> > with some cosmetic changes.
> >
> > Starting form the base, OOo, LIbò should become an autonomous, unique 
> > software
> > being, and the names are very, very important.
> >
> > Ciao
> 
> 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to